surveillance

The Panopticon Grows: How Tech Giants Share Data with Governments

Evidence of systematic data sharing between major tech platforms and government agencies, and what it means for digital privacy.

Author Stanford Internet Observatory
Source https://cyber.stanford.edu/research
Published October 15, 2025

Overview

Government agencies and major tech companies have built systematic data-sharing infrastructure. What began as post-9/11 security measures has evolved into routine surveillance of ordinary citizens through commercial data brokers, ISP partnerships, and platform backdoors.

Key Findings

  • 300+ data-sharing agreements between federal agencies and tech companies documented
  • Meta receives 35,000+ government requests monthly
  • Google processes requests growing 25% year-over-year
  • Average response time: 48 hours (user often not notified)
  • ISPs sell location data to third parties, enabling mass tracking without warrants

Why This Matters

When your Internet is controlled by a handful of corporations beholden to government requests, you have no privacy by design. Citizen-owned networks with no central authority mean:

  • No data to sell or share
  • No single point of government access
  • Encryption and privacy as defaults, not afterthoughts

Discussion

The surveillance economy only works because we’ve outsourced our digital infrastructure to companies with profit motives and compliance obligations. A decentralized, citizen-owned Internet eliminates the middleman—and the motive to harvest or surrender your data.

This isn’t about hiding from law enforcement. It’s about reclaiming the basic right to communicate without corporate or government intermediaries. When your network is run by your community, moderation and access decisions are made locally and transparently—not by algorithms optimizing for data extraction.